Awal pagi ini, sekitar jam 7.40, 22 Ogos 2013, seperti lazimnya, salah satu rutin harian setiap awal pagi saya di pejabat adalah menyemak email dan juga berita semasa. Lalu saya terbaca berita ini:
Two
more Putrajaya men with relatives in the office
The Malaysian Insider
Relatives of some members of the Najib administration are on government
payroll, in direct conflict with Putrajaya’s directive that these family
members can only work in parliamentary constituencies.
Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Seri Shahidan Kassim
has a daughter working in his office while Agriculture and Agro-based Industry
deputy minister Datuk Tajuddin Abdul Rahman’s son-in-law works for him.
Shahidan declined to comment when asked by The Malaysian Insider.
"Nobody is talking about this and I also don't want to talk about
it," he said when met at the Prime Minister's Department's Hari Raya open
house in Putrajaya yesterday.
When pressed if his daughter Nur Shafizah was his principal private
secretary, a "gazetted position", Shahidan repeatedly said he did not
want to talk about it.
"People should stop finding fault with me. I am already having a
tough time in Parliament," he said.
Tajuddin also refused to admit or deny that his son-in-law, Firdaus
Mufazal Faiz, was working with him.
“They don’t know head or tail. This is cheap politics,” responded
Tajuddin.
The employment of relatives in “gazetted positions” came to light after
Tourism and Culture Minister Datuk Seri Mohd Nazri Aziz drew flak for
purportedly employing his son Muhammad Nedim to work in the ministry,
triggering complaints of nepotism and cronyism.
However, Nazri clarified that his son, Nedim, had no official
appointment as special officer with the ministry but was only working for him
to serve youths in his parliamentary constituency of Padang Rengas in Perak.
He had said Nedim was not on the government payroll and was being paid
by him.
In response to the criticisms against Nazri, Prime Minister Datuk Seri
Najib Razak had said there was no problem with a minister or a member of the
government administration recruiting a family member as his aide if it did not
involve any payment of salary or allowance by the government.
"If such an aide is hired by the minister and gets paid by the
government, it is not allowed.
"But if the work is carried out on a voluntary basis and the aide
is not a member of the minister's office, we have no objection to this. (It's
okay if) he assists in the programmes and does not involve any payment to him
by the government," the prime minister had said.
Najib also said administration members could hire their relatives for
constituency work. – August 22, 2013.
Hasil carian oleh saya pada jam 7.45 pagi 22 Ogos 2013 di 2
laman sesawang:
1. Puan Nur Shafizah Shahidan
Penolong Setiausaha
UNIT KEURUSETIAAN DASAR SOSIAL
NEGARA
BAHAGIAN PELAKSANAAN DASAR
SOSIAL NEGARA
Kementerian Pembangunan Wanita,
Keluarga dan Masyarakat (KPWKM)
http://www.kpwkm.gov.my/search-officer?p_p_id=XY_CONTACT_PERSON_WAR_XYStaffportlet&p_p_lifecycle=0&p_p_state=normal&p_p_mode=view&p_p_col_id=column-1&p_p_col_pos=1&p_p_col_count=2&_XY_CONTACT_PERSON_WAR_XYStaffportlet_jspPage=%2Fhtml%2Fxy%2Fcontact_person%2Fview.jsp
Appendix B: Lab Members
Data management:
Nur Shafizah Shahidan KPWKM
SAYA NAK TANYA: OLEH SEBAB SAYA TIDAK MENGENALI Nur Shafizah Shahidan, ADAKAH ORANG YANG DIMAKSUDKAN DI DALAM BERITA THE MALAYSIAN INSIDER DI ATAS ADALAH ORANG YANG SAMA DENGAN 2 SUMBER CARIAN YANG SAMA TEMUI ITU? Seseorang menyatakan ianya: "YA".
Kalau "YA", maka maknanya Nur Shafizah Shahidan "sudah bekerja sebagai pegawai awam (yang sememangnya mendapat gaji sebagai pegawai awam) sebelum Datuk Seri Shahidan Kassim dilantik menjadi Menteri. CUMA, DAHULUNYA Nur Shafizah Shahidan bekerja di Kementerian Pembangunan Wanita dan Kebajikan Masyarakat. Kini beliau "diminta" (diarahkan) atau dipindahkan untuk berkhidmat di Jabatan Perdana Menteri.
JADI:
APA SALAHNYA? TIDAK ADA YANG MENJADI KESALAHAN, BUKAN?
Cuma, jika anaknya itu menggunakan pengaruh tak wajar (undue influence) atau bapanya menggunakan juga pengaruh tak wajar dalam "hal-hal yang tak wajar", barulah ianya MENYALAHI UNDANG-UNDANG, atau sekurang-kurangnya KESALAHAN SECARA MORAL (MORALLY WRONG).
KITA YANG MENULIS BERITA, BERCAKAP ATAU MENYEBARKAN MAKLUMAT, PERLULAH/HENDAKLAH SENTIASA BERADA DI DALAM AMALAN/SIKAP "SEMUA BENAR, DAN SELURUHNYA BENAR, DAN TIADA TANG TIDAK BENAR (MENGELIRUKAN DAN SEBAGAINYA). Undang-undang sivil serta hukum Islam berpegang kepada prinsip "Tell The Truth: The whole truth and nothing but the truth".
SESEORANG YANG BERCAKAP TIDAK BENAR, ATAU SEPARUH BENAR ITU SAMA LAH DENGAN MEMBUAT FITNAH, DAN KITA PUN TAHU HUKUMNYA BAGI ORANG YANG MEMBUAT FITNAH, kan?
NOTA: SAYA BUKAN ORANG POLITIK, DAN TULISAN DI ATAS ADALAH DARIPADA PERSPEKTIF UNDANG-UNDANG.
